Author Topic: Confused Camaro... (Read 812 times)

Titsy · « **on:** October 16, 2006, 07:50:43 pm »

eBay spot with Viper stipes, Mustang wheels, and the black headlight surrounds painted in ,which IMHO looks wrong...

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1989-Chevrolet-Camaro-RS-2-8L-V6-auto-NO-RESERVE_W0QQitemZ190039783906QQihZ009QQcategoryZ18301QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

55starchief · « **Reply #1 on:** October 16, 2006, 07:53:05 pm »

Those wheels are anteras i had the same ones on my SAAB 9000

Titsy · « **Reply #2 on:** October 16, 2006, 07:53:06 pm »

Also, it might be an optical illusion, but those wheels/tyres look to small too.....

Titsy · « **Reply #3 on:** October 16, 2006, 07:54:12 pm »

Quoting: 55starchief

Those wheels are anteras i had the same ones on my SAAB 9000

Whatever they are, they're nastey... Not my cup of tea at all, but each to they're own...

ianjpage · « **Reply #4 on:** October 16, 2006, 08:05:15 pm »

Hmm does look odd!!

55starchief · « **Reply #5 on:** October 16, 2006, 08:10:05 pm »

Quoting: Titsy

Quoting: 55starchief
Those wheels are anteras i had the same ones on my SAAB 9000

Whatever they are, they're nastey... Not my cup of tea at all, but each to they're own...

Well it was the early 90's when i had them 17" rims were just starting to become available and max power was a proper magazine

Titsy · « **Reply #6 on:** October 16, 2006, 08:13:10 pm »

Quoting: 55starchief

Well it was the early 90's when i had them 17" rims were just starting to become available and max power was a proper magazine

And I was about 10 years old....

FUBAR · « **Reply #7 on:** October 16, 2006, 10:23:39 pm »

Hmm, its a bit chavy and I don't like the white seats.
also what appears to be rust on the strut towers and firewall look slightly worrying, shame its a V6 too because those engines look silly in that engine bay

HardRockCamaro · « **Reply #8 on:** October 16, 2006, 10:47:29 pm »

Quoting: 55starchief

max power was a proper magazine

I remember Maxy P from issue 1.
It was a real good magazine back in those days.

F Body · « **Reply #9 on:** October 17, 2006, 04:29:17 am »

Don't think the car is that bad, bad but not dire !

I'd be more worried about having a whole 2.8 litres to get it moving

Roadkill · « **Reply #10 on:** October 17, 2006, 08:12:48 am »

Quoting: Titsy

and the black headlight surrounds painted in ,which IMHO looks wrong...

Ditto.

I was saying to Chris at the weekend - the resessed headlights is what sets the third and early fourth gens apart from the other Camaro's.

They give the car an aggressive look . . painting them in looks nasty . . . IMO, of course.

FUBAR · « **Reply #11 on:** October 17, 2006, 08:34:59 am »

My Old one had the recesses painted body coloured but I think it looked fine because it was a dark colour anyway. New one has them Black

Titsy · « **Reply #12 on:** October 17, 2006, 11:06:15 am »

Quoting: Roadkill

I was saying to Chris at the weekend - the resessed headlights is what sets the third and early fourth gens apart from the other Camaro's.

They give the car an aggressive look . . painting them in looks nasty . . . IMO, of course.

Agreed! The aggressive front end is what I like most about my 'maro...

Followed closely by the 8 cylinder symphony...

Giblets · « **Reply #13 on:** October 17, 2006, 05:10:57 pm »

Yeah the wheels are horrible and Philo's was the only white third gen I've ever liked the look of. White recesses look bad too.

Quite like the interior though. Proper pimp.

But 2 large for a V6 third gen ?!?!?

per-lease......

It would have to be mint.